Quid Pro Quo
What is quid pro quo?
Quid pro quo is a Latin phrase that translates to “this for that” or
“something for something”. One could
use quid pro quo in a harassing situation.
For example…”If you do not do a sexual favor for me then your job could
be jeopardized”. This is where
sexual harassment is considered to be a factor.
Harassment based on sex is a violation in Title VII of the Civil Rights
Act of 1964. Several cases were
thrown upon the court in an act to sue the plaintiff on account of an elementary
school flirt. Therefore boundaries
regarding sexual favors in the workplace were established.
It was not until 1980, when the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
(EEOC) set guidelines to distinguish sexual harassment from “satisfying a
personal urge”.
Even after these rules or laws were brought forth,
companies still have quid pro quo harassment.
Probably because the harasser puts the victim in hard to turn down
scenarios, such as “If you want that raise, that promotion…if you want to keep
your job, you’ll have to sleep with me.”
Typical quid pro quo situations are suggestions of unnecessary
after-hours work or out-of-town travel, statements like “It would really help
your career to work more closely with me,” or “If you want that assignment,
you’re going to have to be nice to me.”
Then the victim has fear of losing his/her job, so they play along.
I mean who would want to damage or lose their career.
Although, some employees will resign, or quit their jobs from having to
work in a hostile environment.
The harasser is one who is higher in authority, one who can make these
kinds of job-related threats or promises.
The immediate supervisor (boss) or someone who has the actual or apparent
authority to affect terms and conditions of employment.
In order for the defending party to be believed, the victim must have
evidence. Money damages for example
to claim quid pro quo harassment.
Damages can include monies associated with lost promotion opportunities, missed
raises, or in the event of actual or constructive discharge, the full value of
wages and benefits lost less an amount the charging party might reasonably have
earned had she pursued another job opportunity.
One incident can be enough in quid pro quo situations.
Quid pro quo harassment is equally unlawful whether the victim resists
and suffers the threatened harm or submits and thus avoids the threatened harm.
Then there is quid pro quo exchange.
This does not involve sexual favors.
For example, quid pro quo can make a contract binding or is a usable tool
in politics.